NOBEL PRIZE WINNER AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE DNA MOLECULE CLAIMS THAT OUR GENES HAVE EXTRATERRESTRIAL ORIGIN
NOBEL PRIZE WINNER AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE DNA MOLECULE CLAIMS THAT OUR GENES HAVE EXTRATERRESTRIAL ORIGIN
NOBEL PRIZE WINNER AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE DNA MOLECULE CLAIMS THAT OUR GENES HAVE EXTRATERRESTRIAL ORIGIN
Francis Crick was a prominent English scientist who co-founded the structure of the DNA molecule in 1953. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for Medicine. Given his book, Life Itself, we realize that he was stating that the DNA molecule could not have been generated here on Earth.
Crick was one of many brilliant scientists who were unfortunately not given much attention by the media. The reason for that was that he was theorizing something that challenged the dominant framework.
In his 1982 book, Life Itself, he discusses how the DNA molecule could not originate here on Earth but somewhere else.
The prevailing scientific thought is that we appeared when a group of molecules randomly collided, generating life.
However, in Mr. Crick’s view, we are a result of so-called Directed Panspermia. He and Leslie Orgel, a British chemist, published his theory in 1973.
His paper talks about how “organisms were deliberately transmitted to earth by intelligent beings on another planet. We conclude that life may have arrived on earth in this way, but that the scientific evidence is inadequate at this time to say anything about the probability. We draw attention to the types of evidence that could shed additional light on the subject.”
Regarding the main theory we mentioned above, Crick’s opinion is that it is probably not reliable.
On the other hand, regarding his theory, he has many supporters who have claimed that they found evidence to substantiate it. Perhaps he even had evidence himself that he never produced. After all, he was not just someone on the street, an imaginative and hungry mind, he was a scientist who won a Nobel Prize on the subject of the DNA molecule.
However, we have not yet found the full biological functions of total DNA. This means that the whole concept has a lot of mystery. Mystery that could have the answer to the real origin of the human.
A couple of years ago, the Director of the Buckingham Center for Astrobiology at the University of Buckingham, Chandra Wickramasinghe, published a study. The object of the investigation involved alleged discoveries of the first evidence of extraterrestrial life on a celestial body.
Wickramasinghe made a splash with the Huffington Post in 1962:
Hoyle and I pioneered the theory of carbon grains in space to replace the old ice grain theory. The astronomical community resisted vehemently from the start, but with the advent of infrared spectroscopy, the ice grain theory gave way to the carbon dust theory. Within a few years, after a great deal of model fitting, we concluded that the biomaterial-like material fit all available data in astronomy. We consider the possibility that microbiology has a universal character, and no observation in astronomy or new information in biology has evidence to the contrary. If only ideas that are considered orthodox are supported through the award of publication opportunities, it is certain that the progress of science will be stifled as it was during middle age.”
Also, author Graham Hancock said that we resemble species that have amnesia. Apparently, we don’t remember who we are and how we got to Earth. Interesting, huh?
