We usually look at U̳F̳O̳s as the final spark leading to the end of life on earth as we know it. But, people have started to challenge that notion and dismiss it as nothing more than propaganda spread by the media. Leading experts now believe that U̳F̳O̳s are not aggressive, just really misrepresented.
In an interview about unidentified aerial phenomena, Dr. Richard F. Haines explained the features that help distinguish the facts when observing U̳F̳O̳ phenomena.
The most important one is that U̳F̳O̳s are not aggressive based on sightings. They show interest and curiosity whenever they interact with our planes instead of wanting to attack.
U̳F̳O̳s and a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳s are only feared because of the persona pop culture, and films gave to them. But this should not mean that we should be afraid of them. Most evidence suggests that they are not as dangerous as we claim them to be.
Former NASA Senior Scientist Dr. Richard F. Haines talked about Unidentified Flying Objects and mentioned the observations of more than 3,000 pilots. He spoke about the sightings and how these objects usually behaved in these scenarios.
A senior NASA scientist recently made a controversial statement that U̳F̳O̳ sightings are not aggressive in nature. He has been quoted as saying, “It is not a case of somebody coming down to visit and that’s the end of it.”
NASA does not just deal with science but also space exploration and discovery. If we want to progress as a c̳i̳v̳i̳l̳i̳z̳a̳t̳i̳o̳n̳, we need to get past the fear associated with these sightings. and the unknown.”We need to understand these encounters and to move forw̳a̳r̳d with technology. If we don’t, we run the risk of missing out on an opportunity for a discovery that could help our species in ways we cannot yet fathom.”
“I am not suggesting that we should hide from the possibility of a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳ visitation. But, I think it’s important to note that we haven’t been visited yet.”
Senior NASA scientist and professor emeritus of astronomy at the University of Arizona, John Mather stated in a recent interview that there is no evidence that a̳l̳i̳e̳n̳s have made contact with Earth. He went on to say that the U̳F̳O̳ sightings are “not aggressive.”
A NASA scientist has recently stated that U̳F̳O̳ sightings are not aggressive.
On Tuesday, a senior NASA scientist, who is also a popular radio host, said that “U̳F̳O̳ sightings are not aggressive despite what anyone might think.”
He goes on to say that they “will go away and leave us alone if we stop complaining about them.”
He also mentions: “Crazy beliefs like these do nothing but harm people’s lives.”
Of course, this statement will be met with mixed reactions.
These objects were found and tracked using radar, maneuvers beyond what any known technology could do, reaching unimaginable speeds. These U̳F̳O̳s also commonly approached human airplanes and behaved with curiosity. Once, a military aircraft also observed that despite how critical electronic capabilities are, such as being able to launch missiles, they were usually disabled when flying close to these objects.
A notable example of these encounters happened in 1976. Iranian fighters encountered a U̳F̳O̳, and their weapons went out of order.
In half of the encounters Dr. Haines studied, the U̳F̳O̳ is the one who would approach our planes. They would also avoid our planes just enough to avoid a collision. This is nothing close to how we have portrayed them in recent years. What if U̳F̳O̳s are not aggressive, and we are just projecting our insecurities on things we do not understand? It will take some time, but we’re bound to find which one is true,
Today, Dr. Haines is currently working as the Chief Scientist for NARCAP, an organization that has investigated, documented, and analyzed aviation security and U̳F̳O̳ encounters and sightings since 1999.